I'm not sure if it was really the intent or not, but I also thought of the character as a commentary of the "genius evil businessman" trope. It is when he beats the shit out of that guy that he starts to get back to his roots and his character starts making sense.
#How many episodes in true detective season 1 series
It isn't until late in the series that we see the facade start to break away and the "real" Frank Semyon appear-the dumb thug rather than the cunning mob boss. He tries to talk like a philosophical intellectual, but it is unconvincing since that isn't true to who he really is. His story is a popular one in LA-guy tries to move to the big city to reinvent himself but can't change who he is. He desires to be seen as a true member of the elite class, but he'll always be a street thug to them. Fancy clothes, casino, hot wife, but it is all empty. He views himself as a Wilson Fisk Kingpin-type guy, but it's smoke and mirrors. He was successful at being a small time crook and now he's trying to become big time. Vince Vaughn's character Frank Semyon is a low level street thug trying (and failing) at being a mob boss. I was under the impression that was kind of the point. I’m excited to see what season three has in store, but I’m personally of the opinion that season two really was that bad and the only reason it could be considered anything else was it’s premium production values and a mildly interesting ending thematically Season one in retrospect was an incredible balancing act and has far more blemishes than you’d think if you rewatch it after season two. I think that Woody’s role in season one cannot be understated because he played the straight man to Rust’s grimdark ramblings while also balancing in his own grimdark tendencies. I think the big problem here is that Pizolatto (sp?) definitely rushed this out and didn’t have anyone to object to questionable choices like season one did.
![how many episodes in true detective season 1 how many episodes in true detective season 1](https://images2.minutemediacdn.com/image/fetch/c_fill,g_auto,f_auto,h_2800,w_4200/https:%2F%2Fhiddenremote.com%2Ffiles%2F2019%2F01%2Ff1fc2e4155ffe5350392aab8dd1d9d3dcba94936aa71d9e25b5ac13f7d5e4ee5.jpg)
His monologues often come across as parody. I think most of the actors give as good a performance as they could, but Vince Vaughn is not convincing as a grizzled monster at all. “These contracts, signatures all over them” The characters are one-dimensional grimdark cutouts that all happen to have tragedy after tragedy after tragedy in their personal lives that it’s hard to take seriously because there is nothing grounding it, and that’s to say nothing of the ridiculous dialogue: Some buddies and I rewatched a few episodes again about a year ago and we were laughing at the poorly telegraphed motivations and events that actually take place. During its run, I watched each episode at least twice trying to understand what was going on and I just couldn’t. The plot is nearly incomprehensible without a guide. I’ve had this conversation with friends a lot and I have to say that I’m firmly of the opinion that, yeah, it is.